Re: clTRID element clarification

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On
> Behalf Of Theo Kramer
> Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2012 11:33 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [provreg] clTRID element clarification
> 
> 
> On 07 Mar 2012, at 11:08 AM, Hollenbeck, Scott wrote:
> >
> > Given that RFC 5730 is part of Standard 69 there's not much chance of
> a near-term amendment, but our process allows us to collect errata. I'm
> not convinced that there's anything here to correct, though. Section
> 2.5 currently says this:
> >
> > "MAY be used to uniquely identify the command *to the client*"
> >
> 
> Is that not perhaps something that slipped through the cracks? Ie.
> should it not read
> 
> "MAY be used to uniquely identify the command from the client" ?

No, the intention is for the clTRID to have meaning only in the client's context. That's not a typo about sending commands to clients.

Scott
_______________________________________________
provreg mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/provreg