Re: Example of stupid inconsistencies between registries

Peter Koch <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.provreg
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Fred,

> Which basically proofs that the DNSKEY interface is not suitable for
> pre-publications too. Remember the purpose of this is to not
> pre-expose the public-key, so why show it to your registry.

i was not referring to the purpose of hiding the key (a myth anyway)
but to what 4641bis (4.1.3) calls "double DS rollover".  That
section explains why there is not always a DNSKEY RR in the DNS
for a DS to be published at the parent.

-Peter
_______________________________________________
provreg mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/provreg
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.