Re: Example of stupid inconsistencies between registries
Peter Koch <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.provreg |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Fred, > Which basically proofs that the DNSKEY interface is not suitable for > pre-publications too. Remember the purpose of this is to not > pre-expose the public-key, so why show it to your registry. i was not referring to the purpose of hiding the key (a myth anyway) but to what 4641bis (4.1.3) calls "double DS rollover". That section explains why there is not always a DNSKEY RR in the DNS for a DS to be published at the parent. -Peter _______________________________________________ provreg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/provreg