Re: draft-wullink-restful-epp-00.txt
Miek Gieben <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.provreg |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
[ Quoting <[email protected]> in "RE: [provreg] draft-wullink-restful..." ] > Miek, > > As I said in our off-list email exchange a few weeks ago, this document > describes something that is "EPP-like" as opposed to an extension of EPP. The > document should make that point clear. Yes, we (try to) do that. The problem is that EPP is *defined* as being stateful, which is clearly something we break. Regards, Miek Gieben _______________________________________________ provreg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/provreg
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 198 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk+VPM0ACgkQJYuFzziA0PaANACeNy49jhZi7ZsbWX6YUBfIx3bj sc8AnjDBuTaeqGNMIRRn10wMVHlb8Ki1 =1J17 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----