Re: draft-wullink-restful-epp-00.txt
"Hollenbeck, Scott" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.provreg |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <831693C2CDA2E849A7D7A712B24E257F0D5F0715@BRN1WNEXMBX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com> |
> -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On > Behalf Of Miek Gieben > Sent: Monday, April 23, 2012 7:28 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [provreg] draft-wullink-restful-epp-00.txt > > [ Quoting <[email protected]> in "RE: [provreg] draft-wullink- > restful..." ] > > Miek, > > > > As I said in our off-list email exchange a few weeks ago, this > > document describes something that is "EPP-like" as opposed to an > > extension of EPP. The document should make that point clear. > > Yes, we (try to) do that. The problem is that EPP is *defined* as being > stateful, which is clearly something we break. It's more than just the stateful/stateless change. While you're reusing the XML data structures, the command and response syntax is different. The command and response processors of an existing server-side implementation will need to be changed significantly to implement this mapping. Scott _______________________________________________ provreg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/provreg