Re: draft-wullink-restful-epp-00.txt

Miek Gieben <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.provreg
Message-ID <[email protected]>
[ Quoting <[email protected]> in "RE: [provreg] draft-wullink-restful..." ]
> > Yes, we (try to) do that. The problem is that EPP is *defined* as being
> > stateful, which is clearly something we break.
> 
> It's more than just the stateful/stateless change. While you're reusing the
> XML data structures, the command and response syntax is different. The command
> and response processors of an existing server-side implementation will need to
> be changed significantly to implement this mapping.

Yep, that's true. But those command and reposonse processors do become a lot 
simpler with REPP.

Regards,
Miek Gieben

_______________________________________________
provreg mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/provreg
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 198 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAk+VQMkACgkQJYuFzziA0PbKjACfYNyrobtTkXX6nb7Zz3F+OSqG
XEEAoOtfwjBP1boBcaNgDBMq3JrX+OiA
=gCJg
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.