Re: Launch Phase EPP Extension Version 02 Posted

Thanks James, Wil, and Gavin for putting the draft together.  I'm still reviewing the document, however I have a concern with the list of statuses (Section 2.3).  While having a defined list makes it easier for different parties to understand what each status means, it could be too restrictive.  It's conceivable to have statuses around the auction process for validated applications.  So should extension to status be allowed?

current list of statuses:
       <restriction base="token">
           <enumeration value="pending"/>
           <enumeration value="validated"/>
           <enumeration value="invalid"/>
           <enumeration value="allocated"/>
           <enumeration value="rejected"/>
         </restriction>

Trung

From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Gould, James
Sent: Friday, August 10, 2012 10:23 AM
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: [provreg] Launch Phase EPP Extension Version 02 Posted

I've been working with Wil Tan and Gavin Brown on updating the Launch Phase EPP Extension Mapping to support the two models (ICANN and ARI/Neustar) along with the models that were previously defined in the Launch Phase EPP Extension Version 01.  You can find the draft at the URL http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-tan-epp-launchphase-02.txt.  This is a straw man draft to kick off the discussions as the tmch-tech list works out the model.  I've already posted a message on the tmch-tech list to start the discussions there.

--

JG

[cid:[email protected]]

James Gould
Principal Software Engineer
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>

703-948-3271 (Office)
12061 Bluemont Way
Reston, VA 20190
VerisignInc.com

_______________________________________________
provreg mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/provreg