Re: Launch Phase EPP Extension Version 02 Posted

Gavin Brown <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.provreg
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi Trung,

On 15/08/2012 21:10, Tran, Trung wrote:
> Thanks James, Wil, and Gavin for putting the draft together.  I’m still
> reviewing the document, however I have a concern with the list of
> statuses (Section 2.3).  While having a defined list makes it easier for
> different parties to understand what each status means, it could be too
> restrictive.  It’s conceivable to have statuses around the auction
> process for validated applications.  So should extension to status be
> allowed?

If we make the status element arbitrary, then each server will have its
own set of codes that each client will have to learn via some out of
band channel such as documentation or a support ticket, and will have to
develop business logic for handling them. By keeping this element an
enumeration we're making it much easier for clients to support this
extension.

If there are other status codes that would be useful, let's try to
generate an exhaustive list before we throw the baby out with the bath
water and make the status code an arbitrary text element.

G.

-- 
Gavin Brown
Chief Technology Officer
CentralNic Ltd
Innovative, Reliable and Flexible Registry Services
for ccTLD, gTLD and private domain name registries
https://www.centralnic.com/

CentralNic Ltd is a company registered in England and Wales with company
number 4985780. Registered Offices: 35-39 Moorgate, London, EC2R 6AR.
_______________________________________________
provreg mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/provreg
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.