Re: Launch Phase EPP Extension Version 02 Posted
Gavin Brown <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.provreg |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Trung, On 15/08/2012 21:10, Tran, Trung wrote: > Thanks James, Wil, and Gavin for putting the draft together. I’m still > reviewing the document, however I have a concern with the list of > statuses (Section 2.3). While having a defined list makes it easier for > different parties to understand what each status means, it could be too > restrictive. It’s conceivable to have statuses around the auction > process for validated applications. So should extension to status be > allowed? If we make the status element arbitrary, then each server will have its own set of codes that each client will have to learn via some out of band channel such as documentation or a support ticket, and will have to develop business logic for handling them. By keeping this element an enumeration we're making it much easier for clients to support this extension. If there are other status codes that would be useful, let's try to generate an exhaustive list before we throw the baby out with the bath water and make the status code an arbitrary text element. G. -- Gavin Brown Chief Technology Officer CentralNic Ltd Innovative, Reliable and Flexible Registry Services for ccTLD, gTLD and private domain name registries https://www.centralnic.com/ CentralNic Ltd is a company registered in England and Wales with company number 4985780. Registered Offices: 35-39 Moorgate, London, EC2R 6AR. _______________________________________________ provreg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/provreg