Re: Launch Phase EPP Extension Version 02 Posted

Keith Gaughan <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.provreg
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 10:38:43AM +0100, Gavin Brown wrote:
> Hi Trung,
> 
> On 15/08/2012 21:10, Tran, Trung wrote:
> > Thanks James, Wil, and Gavin for putting the draft together.  I’m still
> > reviewing the document, however I have a concern with the list of
> > statuses (Section 2.3).  While having a defined list makes it easier for
> > different parties to understand what each status means, it could be too
> > restrictive.  It’s conceivable to have statuses around the auction
> > process for validated applications.  So should extension to status be
> > allowed?
> 
> If we make the status element arbitrary, then each server will have its
> own set of codes that each client will have to learn via some out of
> band channel such as documentation or a support ticket, and will have to
> develop business logic for handling them. By keeping this element an
> enumeration we're making it much easier for clients to support this
> extension.

From my perspective as a registrar, I'm in complete agreement with Gavin:
arbitrary registry-specific extensions and behaviour variations are hell for us,
and the less of that there is, the better for us.

It would be better, from a registrar's perspective, if we attempted to nail down
this kind of thing as well as possible now, and later, if it turns out that
further statuses are required, the list is revised (and possibly the version
number is bumped up). That allows registrar clients to key their behaviour to
things announced at connection time rather than being riddled with
registry-specific behaviour.

Extensibility is all well and good, but a well-defined set of states and state
transitions that *everybody* agrees upon is vastly more valuable.

K.

-- 
Keith Gaughan, Development Lead
PGP/GPG key ID: 82AC3634
Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd. <http://blacknight.com/>
12A Barrowside Business Park, Carlow, Ireland
Registered in Ireland, Company No.: 370845
_______________________________________________
provreg mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/provreg
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.