Re: Standard Extensions

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On
> Behalf Of Günther Mair
> Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2012 6:40 AM
> To: Keith Gaughan
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [provreg] Standard Extensions
> 
> >> So, I want to see registries harmonize their implementations. Talk
> >> with each other. Coordinate. Have someone say "we have a cool
> >> extension, but we will not implement this before we have ten other
> >> registries also agreeing to implementing it".
> >
> > Agreed. From a registrar's perspective, the proliferation of registry
> 'quirks'
> > is the single biggest source of headaches we have.
> 
> Add me as one more registrar in this line-up.
> As Keith already suggested a few times (btw. I loved the one about "the
> beautiful and unique snowflakes that they are") and Patrik confirmed,
> the various registries behavior is a nightmare to us.
> 
> Just think about the internet where every country had it's own
> "protocol quirks" because of some "internal policies".
> But in the long term I hope it will be in the registries own best
> interest to help standardize and then stick to the agreed upon
> standard. Think about it the way Patrik explained.

Serious question: as a registrar, why do you do business with registries that give you nightmares?

Scott
_______________________________________________
provreg mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/provreg