Re: Standard Extensions

Günther Mair <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.provreg
Message-ID <[email protected]>
>> So, I want to see registries harmonize their implementations. Talk with each
>> other. Coordinate. Have someone say "we have a cool extension, but we will not
>> implement this before we have ten other registries also agreeing to
>> implementing it".
> 
> Agreed. From a registrar's perspective, the proliferation of registry 'quirks'
> is the single biggest source of headaches we have.

Add me as one more registrar in this line-up.
As Keith already suggested a few times (btw. I loved the one about "the beautiful and unique snowflakes that they are") and Patrik confirmed, the various registries behavior is a nightmare to us.

Just think about the internet where every country had it's own "protocol quirks" because of some "internal policies".
But in the long term I hope it will be in the registries own best interest to help standardize and then stick to the agreed upon standard. Think about it the way Patrik explained.

Regards

Günther

_______________________________________________
provreg mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/provreg
smime.p7s (application/pkcs7-signature, 4.3 KB) - not displayed
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.