Re: Standard Extensions
Keith Gaughan <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.provreg |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 07:37:30AM +0200, Patrik Fältström wrote: > On 23 aug 2012, at 06:14, Kevin Tse <[email protected]> wrote: > > > We have several private extensions which are not summited as rfc drafts > > and some extensions which are summited as rfc drafts. > > So, I want to see registries harmonize their implementations. Talk with each > other. Coordinate. Have someone say "we have a cool extension, but we will not > implement this before we have ten other registries also agreeing to > implementing it". Agreed. From a registrar's perspective, the proliferation of registry 'quirks' is the single biggest source of headaches we have. -- Keith Gaughan, Development Lead PGP/GPG key ID: 82AC3634 Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd. <http://blacknight.com/> 12A Barrowside Business Park, Carlow, Ireland Registered in Ireland, Company No.: 370845 _______________________________________________ provreg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/provreg