Re: Standard Extensions

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Patrik Fältström [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2012 8:11 AM
> To: Hollenbeck, Scott
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [provreg] Standard Extensions
> 
> 
> On 23 aug 2012, at 14:08, "Hollenbeck, Scott"
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> > Probably true (casting glances in the direction of ICANN, at least
> from the gTLD perspective), but I guess part of the reason I asked the
> question is because one such penalty could be a lack of support from
> registrars - who are unfortunately caught in the middle.
> 
> The world is not only gTLDs. Those registries are (according to my
> experience) much more synchronized than ccTLDs.
> 
> epp is a protocol for TLDs, not gTLDs.

Yeah, I get that :). We haven't had a lot of success with broad ccTLD coordination.

Scott
_______________________________________________
provreg mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/provreg