Re: Standard Extensions

>> Probably true (casting glances in the direction of ICANN, at least from the gTLD perspective), but I guess part of the reason I asked the question is because one such penalty could be a lack of support from registrars - who are unfortunately caught in the middle.
> 
> The world is not only gTLDs. Those registries are (according to my experience) much more synchronized than ccTLDs.
> 
> epp is a protocol for TLDs, not gTLDs.

True, it may be lack of support from registrars; all the more a reason for us to make a statement about this situation here, where some of them listed in.
One more explanation could be the a transition from their previous, local policies towards EPP.

And yes, it's mainly ccTLDs that would need to get their policies better synchronized (contact object extensions being a big issue).

Günther

_______________________________________________
provreg mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/provreg