Re: Extension for an abuse contact in Domain objects?
"Michele Neylon :: Blacknight" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.provreg |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <D1AC4482BED7C04DAC43491E9A9DBEC3010DD2A5@bkexchmbx01.blacknight.local> |
Luis Most of our registrants wouldn't know what what to do with an abuse report. As a hosting provider and registrar we end up having to pro-actively contact our clients when there are issues and explain to them in simple terms how to remedy them. While I can see that kind of thing being of use to the more technically minded registrant I'd imagine that they're in a minority and would probably be more likely to have some kind of reseller access if they were registering larger number of domains .. Regards Michele -- Mr Michele Neylon Blacknight Solutions Hosting & Colocation, Brand Protection http://www.blacknight.com/ http://blog.blacknight.com/ http://mneylon.tel/ Intl. +353 (0) 59 9183072 Locall: 1850 929 929 Direct Dial: +353 (0)59 9183090 Fax. +353 (0) 1 4811 763 Twitter: http://twitter.com/mneylon ------------------------------- Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside Business Park,Sleaty Road,Graiguecullen,Carlow,Ireland Company No.: 370845 ________________________________________ From: Luis Muñoz [[email protected]] Sent: 29 October 2012 14:39 To: Michele Neylon :: Blacknight Cc: Gould, James; [email protected] Subject: Re: [provreg] Extension for an abuse contact in Domain objects? On Oct 29, 2012, at 10:12 AM, Michele Neylon :: Blacknight wrote: > James - yeah. Without giving it a huge amount of thought we'd probably just have a standard abuse contact point in our whois template. In this case, the contact would point to the Registrar -- handling this at the template level is certainly one way to go. However, I was thinking along the lines of a per-object abuse contact that would point to the Registrant. Best regards -lem _______________________________________________ provreg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/provreg