Re: Extension for an abuse contact in Domain objects?
"Gould, James" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.provreg |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <C41D7AF7FCECBE44940E9477E8E70D7A0D709BF9@BRN1WNEXMBX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com> |
It doesn't look like an object level contact reference. If a Registrar has an abuse contact linked to it or embedded in it, than the abuse contact information to include in whois can be automatically derived from the sponsoring registrar without having to explicitly set another contact on a per object basis. -- JG James Gould Principal Software Engineer [email protected] 703-948-3271 (Office) 12061 Bluemont Way Reston, VA 20190 VerisignInc.com On 10/29/12 10:39 AM, "Luis Muñoz" <[email protected]> wrote: > >On Oct 29, 2012, at 10:12 AM, Michele Neylon :: Blacknight wrote: > >> James - yeah. Without giving it a huge amount of thought we'd probably >>just have a standard abuse contact point in our whois template. > >In this case, the contact would point to the Registrar -- handling this >at the template level is certainly one way to go. > >However, I was thinking along the lines of a per-object abuse contact >that would point to the Registrant. > >Best regards > >-lem > _______________________________________________ provreg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/provreg