Re: contact:disclose clarifications / best practices
Bernhard Reutner-Fischer <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.provreg |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAC1BbcQSOo9L0Ts4yWUB_2BkY=APkR-0UpeRwSfHgBWYoE7tKg@mail.gmail.com> |
On 23 January 2013 13:57, Klaus Malorny <[email protected]> wrote: > Ideally, a third-party person should not be able to distinguish between a > field that is not present and a field that is not disclosed. But this is > impossible for fields which are considered mandatory by the protocol. exactly. Iff you regard all non-sponsoring registrars of a contact as "third party" you would have to fill in dummy data in those fields that are mandatory in the protocol (name, addr/cc, addr/city, email). Scotts reply seems to indicate that this is not the case, though; in this case one can always hand out all contact-data to everybody via EPP and as such the issue is moot. thanks, _______________________________________________ provreg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/provreg