Re: contact:disclose clarifications / best practices
Keith Gaughan <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.provreg |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 03:21:48PM +0100, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: > On 23 January 2013 13:28, Hollenbeck, Scott <[email protected]> wrote: > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On > >> Behalf Of Keith Gaughan > >> Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2013 7:21 AM > >> To: Bernhard Reutner-Fischer > >> Cc: [email protected] > >> Subject: Re: [provreg] contact:disclose clarifications / best practices > >> > >> On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 11:26:31AM +0100, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer > >> wrote: > >> > >> > I have questions about contact:disclose. > > > > [snip] > > > >> I think the disclosure fields deal more with the likes of what's published > >> in WHOIS and the likes. > > > > Yes, that use case certainly applies. I've always thought of it as an > > indication of registrant disclosure preference in the context of registry > > operator policy. There is thus no single answer to what gets returned > > because privacy policies will vary from operator to operator. > > So you consider any registrar that is not sponsor of that contact to not be > third party, is that right? If they have the authorisation code for a linked domain, they implicitly have authorisation for querying the contact in question, so while they might be a third party, they're a third party who's authorised to access the information in question. > In other words: The disclose flag is completely ignored for every > contact:info command from any registrar. It is solely used to > determine if the affected contact-data is handed out to entities > outside of the registry, like public whois-service. Lets say that the registry allowed <contact:info> for any contact object, regardless of whether they owned it or not. If it was queried by a registrar who didn't own it without the authorisation code or the authorisation code of a linked object, the disclosure policy would apply. Registrars need to get this periodic raised access to deal with transfers. K. -- Keith Gaughan, Development Lead PGP/GPG key ID: 82AC3634 Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd. <http://blacknight.com/> 12A Barrowside Business Park, Carlow, Ireland Registered in Ireland, Company No.: 370845 _______________________________________________ provreg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/provreg