Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-gieben-epp-keyrelay-00.txt
Antoin Verschuren <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.provreg |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Op 24-01-13 18:09, Klaus Malorny schreef: > while it would be a bit too lax for me, if it is the desired > design principle to give no assurances about what the registrar > does with the DNSKEY data in the message, you also need not to give > any assurances on the expiration timestamp I suggested to be > relayed along with the DNSKEYs. Let it simply be a hint to the > (potentially) losing registrar. Hi Klaus, We have no principal objection to an optional expire field in the keyrelay command just because we do not see any use for it in the experiences with our registrars, but if other registries might want to force their registrars by policy to have their 3th party DNS operators to enter resource records in DNS for a specific time, we wish them luck. So how would such an expire field look like? Would it be an expire timer, like a TTL, or an expire date (not valid after yyyymmdd, unixtime, someting else?) Do you have any sugestion for a field definition? - -- Antoin Verschuren Technical Policy Advisor SIDN Meander 501, PO Box 5022, 6802 EA Arnhem, The Netherlands P: +31 26 3525500 M: +31 6 23368970 Mailto: [email protected] XMPP: [email protected] HTTP://www.sidn.nl/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJRAk/cAAoJEDqHrM883Agnq74H/0wM5ZopQK0AIwrlpCLXDqbE DAplMj8VxskjNHklfJcvIzNpoBA1/l+oFCipY2jeKACvqUkV3X43mAq6oJ5gnIi+ bSnzI604C1sW4+4LOZQx3fj5kUXrRizkmgdUNOIGGouJW/G2RUNFF9V/370lCHhL cHt5HiMHYpCHDS9LwimSc+d4k3nAOZTQsiuHVN/am/8zMevcl3/kAQ8j9sw412o4 wCUCAaVKguGPHhQBpF6oBEYkmlUp6V9C5l8GR+tDGkx1cj4bXMosMl6ennpNMb1x 4eEofXjpkD3cfM6FsXybYedTH1LLOiQmXAu98tHnyoSTNLbA2DyvCY4EZnt1Mtk= =Y+T+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ provreg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/provreg