Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-gieben-epp-keyrelay-00.txt
Miek Gieben <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.provreg |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
[ Quoting <[email protected]> in "Re: [provreg] Fwd: New Version Noti..." ] > We have no principal objection to an optional expire field in the > keyrelay command just because we do not see any use for it in the > experiences with our registrars, but if other registries might want to > force their registrars by policy to have their 3th party DNS operators > to enter resource records in DNS for a specific time, we wish them luck. > > So how would such an expire field look like? > Would it be an expire timer, like a TTL, or an expire date (not valid > after yyyymmdd, unixtime, someting else?) > Do you have any sugestion for a field definition? I think using the <expiry> element from 5730 is the right thing to do. Regards, -- Miek Gieben http://miek.nl _______________________________________________ provreg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/provreg
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 198 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlECW+gACgkQJYuFzziA0PY+YACgkLwgClnOx5nxvAKNpvlkDxNs d7oAn2zKVMUZUnuLU1yMeZHFHz7KKfW+ =pxfE -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----