Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-gieben-epp-keyrelay-00.txt

Miek Gieben <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.provreg
Message-ID <[email protected]>
[ Quoting <[email protected]> in "Re: [provreg] Fwd: New Version Noti..." ]
> We have no principal objection to an optional expire field in the
> keyrelay command just because we do not see any use for it in the
> experiences with our registrars, but if other registries might want to
> force their registrars by policy to have their 3th party DNS operators
> to enter resource records in DNS for a specific time, we wish them luck.
> 
> So how would such an expire field look like?
> Would it be an expire timer, like a TTL, or an expire date (not valid
> after yyyymmdd, unixtime, someting else?)
> Do you have any sugestion for a field definition?

I think using the <expiry> element from 5730 is the right thing to do.

 Regards,

-- 
    Miek Gieben                                               http://miek.nl

_______________________________________________
provreg mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/provreg
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 198 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAlECW+gACgkQJYuFzziA0PY+YACgkLwgClnOx5nxvAKNpvlkDxNs
d7oAn2zKVMUZUnuLU1yMeZHFHz7KKfW+
=pxfE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.