Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-gieben-epp-keyrelay-00.txt
Klaus Malorny <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.provreg |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 25/01/13 10:26, Antoin Verschuren wrote: > > Hi Klaus, > > We have no principal objection to an optional expire field in the keyrelay > command just because we do not see any use for it in the experiences with our > registrars, but if other registries might want to force their registrars by > policy to have their 3th party DNS operators to enter resource records in DNS > for a specific time, we wish them luck. > > So how would such an expire field look like? Would it be an expire timer, > like a TTL, or an expire date (not valid after yyyymmdd, unixtime, someting > else?) Do you have any sugestion for a field definition? > Hi Antoin, since the submission time may differ from the read time of the message (although likely only minutes), I suggest not to use a relative time, but an absolute, ideally the XML Schema data type "dateTime". BTW, I am still a bit puzzled that you and/or registrars see no use for that. With a registrar hat on, I wouldn't want to accept arbitrary DNSKEY records from third parties and keep them for unlimited time in the zone. But maybe I am in a negligible minority ;-) Regards, Klaus _______________________________________________ provreg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/provreg