Re: launch:phase requirement for Sunrise FCFS

Thank you for the confirmation Seth.

Sharon

From: Seth Goldman [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, June 17, 2013 3:01 PM
To: Wodjenski, Sharon
Cc: Gould, James; [email protected]
Subject: Re: [provreg] launch:phase requirement for Sunrise FCFS

I think the idea of the launch update/delete commands is to support operations on applications. If you've already provisioned the domain (presumably you have since it's FCFS), then the standard version of update and delete should be sufficient, in which case you don't need to specify either a phase or an application id.

On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 3:39 PM, Wodjenski, Sharon <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
As we have not received any feedback, we will take Jim's suggestion and not require the launch extension and launch:phase for update/delete commands in FCFS Sunrise.

Jim - could you please update the text in the next revision to clarify this point?

Thanks,

Sharon

From: Gould, James [mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>]
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2013 6:26 PM
To: Wodjenski, Sharon; '[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>'
Subject: Re: [provreg] launch:phase requirement for Sunrise FCFS

Sharon,

The intention in the draft was #2 " For FCFS update/delete commands, the extension is not required at all, and therefore the launch:phase is not specified.".  It would be good to hear from others whether the extension should be included for update and delete commands for launch registrations.

--

JG

[cid:[email protected]]

James Gould
Principal Software Engineer
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>

703-948-3271 (Office)
12061 Bluemont Way
Reston, VA 20190
VerisignInc.com

From: <Wodjenski>, Sharon <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Date: Monday, June 3, 2013 2:05 PM
To: EPP Provreg <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: [provreg] launch:phase requirement for Sunrise FCFS

Hi Everybody,

We've run into a condition during development and are seeking feedback/guidance from the group.

This case is specific to First Come, First Served Sunrises, and the delete/update commands.

When we read this in the spec:

2.2.  Launch Phases

   The server MAY support multiple launch phases sequentially or
   simultaneously.  The <launch:phase> element MUST be included by the
   client to define the target launch phase of the command.

We interpreted that to mean that the launch:phase  was mandatory, and would come in with each command in the extension.

Currently, the XSD for the delete/update commands do not support the application id being optional.  And of course, for a FCFS registration, the application id is not needed/used.


     <element name="update" type="launch:idContainerType"/>

     <element name="delete" type="launch:idContainerType"/>



     <!--

     Common container of id (identifier) element

     -->

     <complexType name="idContainerType">

       <sequence>

         <element name="phase" type="launch:phaseType"/>

         <element name="applicationID" type="launch:applicationIDType"/>

       </sequence>

     </complexType>

So, the question from a client perspective is:


1.        Is the launch:phase, and therefore the extension, mandatory for all commands and the XSD should be modified so that the application id is optional (as it is in the Info command)?

Or

2.       For FCFS update/delete commands, the extension is not required at all, and therefore the launch:phase is not specified.

Thank you for your input on this topic.

Sharon


_______________________________________________
provreg mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/provreg

_______________________________________________
provreg mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/provreg