Re: launch:phase requirement for Sunrise FCFS
"Gould, James" <[email protected]> Mon, 17 Jun 2013 19:45:21 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.provreg |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CDE4DEA7.5130F%[email protected]> |
Sharon, We can add some clarifying text to the next version of the draft. I don't believe that this change alone warrants a new draft version, so we can wait to include it with other updates. Thanks, -- JG [cid:6C2EF356-04B3-47CE-BA8E-B8D03B93BB08] James Gould Principal Software Engineer [email protected] 703-948-3271 (Office) 12061 Bluemont Way Reston, VA 20190 VerisignInc.com From: <Wodjenski>, Sharon <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Date: Tuesday, June 11, 2013 3:39 PM To: James Gould <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, EPP Provreg <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: RE: [provreg] launch:phase requirement for Sunrise FCFS As we have not received any feedback, we will take Jim’s suggestion and not require the launch extension and launch:phase for update/delete commands in FCFS Sunrise. Jim – could you please update the text in the next revision to clarify this point? Thanks, Sharon From: Gould, James [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2013 6:26 PM To: Wodjenski, Sharon; '[email protected]<mailto:'[email protected]>' Subject: Re: [provreg] launch:phase requirement for Sunrise FCFS Sharon, The intention in the draft was #2 " For FCFS update/delete commands, the extension is not required at all, and therefore the launch:phase is not specified.". It would be good to hear from others whether the extension should be included for update and delete commands for launch registrations. -- JG [cid:[email protected]] James Gould Principal Software Engineer [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> 703-948-3271 (Office) 12061 Bluemont Way Reston, VA 20190 VerisignInc.com From: <Wodjenski>, Sharon <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Date: Monday, June 3, 2013 2:05 PM To: EPP Provreg <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: [provreg] launch:phase requirement for Sunrise FCFS Hi Everybody, We’ve run into a condition during development and are seeking feedback/guidance from the group. This case is specific to First Come, First Served Sunrises, and the delete/update commands. When we read this in the spec: 2.2. Launch Phases The server MAY support multiple launch phases sequentially or simultaneously. The <launch:phase> element MUST be included by the client to define the target launch phase of the command. We interpreted that to mean that the launch:phase was mandatory, and would come in with each command in the extension. Currently, the XSD for the delete/update commands do not support the application id being optional. And of course, for a FCFS registration, the application id is not needed/used. <element name="update" type="launch:idContainerType"/> <element name="delete" type="launch:idContainerType"/> <!-- Common container of id (identifier) element --> <complexType name="idContainerType"> <sequence> <element name="phase" type="launch:phaseType"/> <element name="applicationID" type="launch:applicationIDType"/> </sequence> </complexType> So, the question from a client perspective is: 1. Is the launch:phase, and therefore the extension, mandatory for all commands and the XSD should be modified so that the application id is optional (as it is in the Info command)? Or 2. For FCFS update/delete commands, the extension is not required at all, and therefore the launch:phase is not specified. Thank you for your input on this topic. Sharon _______________________________________________ provreg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/provreg
8A7A655D-9ED0-4D38-898D-E9E8B754666E[8].png
(image/png, 4 KB) - not displayed
image001.png
(image/png, 4 KB) - not displayed