Re: Are escrow deposit files per-TLD, or per-registry operator?

I agree with Andrew on this.

-Michael Young


On 2013-06-18, at 4:49 PM, Andrew Sullivan <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 04:42:13PM -0400, Seth Goldman wrote:
>> My suspicion is that it should be the latter. The entire reason for the
>> escrow deposit to exist is to transition to an EBERO in the event that a
>> registry operator is unable to perform its duties. That could happen on a
>> per-TLD basis, but it would be a lot more efficient to do it for *all* TLDs
>> that are managed by that registry operator.
> 
> But a single file would entail that all the registries move _en masse_
> to a single new operator -- an assumption that is pretty brittle.  If
> you have one escrow file per escrowed zone, you can always put them
> together.  If you have one big file, it's work to take them apart.
> 
> Best,
> 
> A
> 
> -- 
> Andrew Sullivan
> [email protected]
> _______________________________________________
> provreg mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/provreg




MICHAEL YOUNG
[email protected]

_______________________________________________
provreg mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/provreg