Re: Are escrow deposit files per-TLD, or per-registry operator?

Sure Chris, an example would be what if one TLD has a set of extensions the other one doesn't? Makes a single block much more complicated to manage.

Also what if a registry operator uses the escrow file as part of their transition efforts for a single TLD out of several in a non-emergency situation? (As in a sale,....)

-Michael

On 2013-06-18, at 4:51 PM, Christopher Browne <[email protected]> wrote:

> Those seem like pretty good questions.
> 
> That said, while an aspect of efficiency could be gained by avoiding the need to write out shared objects multiple times, this involves the assumption that all of the TLDs would be passed on together as a single "block."
> 
> If there is reason to imagine that the TLDs could be passed on individually, then combining the data would be pretty hazardous, both technically, and, I'd think more hazardous, legally.
> _______________________________________________
> provreg mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/provreg




MICHAEL YOUNG
[email protected]

_______________________________________________
provreg mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/provreg