Re: FW: EPP extensions working group

Hollenbeck, Scott <[email protected]> 2013-07-22 15:29
> > I fully support any work that make this list shorter:
> > 
> > <http://search.cpan.org/dist/Net-DRI/>
> 
> Do you know which of those exist in I-D form, Patrik?

From what I remember when implementing them, almost none, or if an I-D
existed it was outdated and not in sync with what was done really.

Please note that if you see the first few lines of comment inside each
Net::DRI::Protocol::EPP::Extensions::* module you see the URL or a
name of PDF I used to do the implementation.

One of the strength of this work is to implement so many extensions
under a common umbrella. But shortening the list is a goal I'm also
interested in.

Please have a look also in this presentation I made in 2006:
http://www.dotandco.com/services/software/Net-DRI/docs/netdri-future-epp-icann-brussels-ccnso-techday-201006/netdri-future-epp-icann-brussels-ccnso-techday-201006.pdf

I do not think many things have changed since then (except number of
extensions and TLDs supported in the toolkit), and it shows
examples of overlap and unfortunate duplication.

PS: if anyone wants to buy chocolate, I love chocolate :-)

-- 
Patrick Mevzek
_______________________________________________
provreg mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/provreg