Re: EPP extensions working group

Here's a summary of the active extension I-Ds I've that may meet Pete's existence and use requirements:

http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-obispo-epp-idn/ (in use?)

http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-tan-epp-launchphase/ (in use)

http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-gieben-epp-keyrelay/ (in use)

http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-wang-epp-cdn-mapping/ (in use?)

http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-xie-epp-trademark-mapping/ (in use?)

I've marked some "in use?" because I'm not sure if they are. If they are, please say so.

If Pete eventually lets us consider expired drafts the pool of candidates can be increased (not all of these are viable candidates, though):

http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/search/?name=epp&olddrafts=on&sort=

Scott

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On
> Behalf Of Hollenbeck, Scott
> Sent: Monday, July 22, 2013 9:16 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [provreg] FW: EPP extensions working group
> 
> Please see the note below from John Levine. Does anyone know of any
> other EPP extensions that meet the conditions laid out by Pete? I'd
> like to consider non-Verisign extensions, too.
> 
> If this effort is successful we may have a better chance of creating a
> working group to develop extensions that don't yet exist or haven't
> been documented in the IETF.
> 
> Scott
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: John R Levine [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Friday, July 19, 2013 4:58 PM
> To: Hollenbeck, Scott; Francisco Obispo; Wil Tan; Gould, James
> Subject: EPP extensions working group
> 
> I talked to Pete Resnick, one of the IETF apps area ADs yesterday, and
> he
> says he's willing to set up a short lived working group to turn EPP
> extension drafts into RFCs.  There are two conditions: that we identify
> the drafts in advance, all of which have to be in current use, and that
> we
> round up enough people with implementation experience to read them and
> confirm that what we plan to publish is what they implemented.
> 
> The drafts currently on my list are:
> 
> IDN Language Tag (http:⁄⁄www.verisigninc.com⁄assets⁄idn-language-
> tag.pdf)
> RGP Poll Mapping (http:⁄⁄www.verisigninc.com⁄assets⁄whois-info-
> extension.pdf)
> Whois Info Extension (http:⁄⁄www.verisigninc.com⁄assets⁄whois-info-
> extension.pdf)
> ConsoliDate Mapping (http:⁄⁄www.verisigninc.com⁄assets⁄consolidate-
> mapping.txt)
> NameStore Extension (http:⁄⁄www.verisigninc.com⁄assets⁄namestore-
> extension.pdf)
> Low Balance Mapping (http:⁄⁄www.verisigninc.com⁄assets⁄low-balance-
> mapping.pdf)
> 
> draft-obispo-epp-idn
> 
> draft-tan-epp-launchphase
> 
> If there are any more you think we should add, please let me know.
> 
> Also, it would be a big help if you could suggest people at registries
> and
> registrars who have implemented these so we can ask them to read along.
> 
> Regards,
> John Levine, [email protected], Taughannock Networks, Trumansburg NY
> "I dropped the toothpaste", said Tom, crestfallenly.
> _______________________________________________
> provreg mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/provreg
_______________________________________________
provreg mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/provreg