Re: FW: EPP extensions working group

On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 03:40:26PM +0200, Ewout de Graaf wrote:

> A standardized undelete / remove from quarantine EPP extension would
> be nice.

Sorry for piping up late on this. Gavin Brown and I have mentioned on
the list that a standardised method for notifying registrars that the
registry plans on garbage collecting unused objects would be useful. We
went over methods that might be done within the contraints of the
existing object mappings, but unfortunately nothing worked without
breaking contraints EPP and the standardised mappings place on us.

I believe that a standardised undelete / remove from quarantine
extension should cover this use-case too. It would be better than the
current practice of some registries that abuse RFC 3915 to implement
removal from quarantine by having registrars issue <rgp:restore
op="request"/> requests.

K.

-- 
Keith Gaughan, Development Lead
PGP/GPG key ID: 82AC3634
Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd. <http://blacknight.com/>
12A Barrowside Business Park, Carlow, Ireland
Registered in Ireland, Company No.: 370845
_______________________________________________
provreg mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/provreg