Re: EPP extensions working group

"Linlin Zhou" <[email protected]> Wed, 14 Aug 2013 11:13:16 +0800
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.provreg
Message-ID <010001ce989c$386200b0$a9260210$@cn>
Agreed. draft-kong-epp-idn-variants-mapping gives the specification of the
variants IDN status, whether it is active or not, I think this needs to be
considered.

Regards,
Linlin

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf
> Of Ning Kong
> Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2013 9:11 AM
> To: Hollenbeck, Scott
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [provreg] EPP extensions working group
> 
> 
> +1
> 
> I suggest my ID about IDN variants can be also considered.
> 
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-kong-epp-idn-variants-mapping/
> 
> Cheers,
> Ning
> 
> > In the interest of trying to move this forward, how about these three
drafts
> as a starting point?
> >
> > draft-gieben-epp-keyrelay
> (http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-gieben-epp-keyrelay/)
> > draft-obispo-epp-idn
(http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-obispo-epp-idn/)
> > draft-tan-epp-launchphase
> (http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-tan-epp-launchphase/)
> >
> > Scott
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > provreg mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/provreg
> _______________________________________________
> provreg mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/provreg

_______________________________________________
provreg mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/provreg