Re: EPP extensions working group

On 14 aug 2013, at 04:44, Jay Daley <[email protected]> wrote:

> I proposed a set of fields to go in this registry last week ()
> 
> To reiterate them:
> 
> Name,  Maintaining Organisation,  TLD,  Purpose,  I-D,  Licensable
> 
> - Name is the name of the extension
> - Maintaining Organisation is whoever is responsible for it now
> - TLD is only included if the extension is limited to one TLD
> - Purpose is a paragraph explaining what this extension is for
> - I-D is the name of the IETF I-D if one exists
> - Licensable is intended to tell others if they can legally use it, which should be either "No", "Maybe" or "Yes" with details of the appropriate license.
> 
> Any thoughts on those?

I think you should also include:

- The identifier (that might be the same for many extensions, as the id is for the DTD) -- or is this what you call "name"?

- The object or function the extension touches

- The TLD that uses the extension

- The URL to the DTD/description (if available)

I also propose "licensable" can indicate whether NDA is needed to even get the documentation (which is the case for some TLDs, i.e. you must sign up to be a registrar before you even know what extensions to EPP you must implement).

   Patrik

_______________________________________________
provreg mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/provreg