Re: Registry lock - two-factor or intervention
Michele Neylon - Blacknight <[email protected]> Wed, 18 Sep 2013 23:32:29 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.provreg |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <D1AC4482BED7C04DAC43491E9A9DBEC38CDFBD76@bkexchmbx02.blacknight.local> |
On 18 Sep 2013, at 23:59, Luis Muñoz <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Sep 18, 2013, at 5:56 PM, Jay Daley wrote: > >> We came to the conclusion that a manual verification (or possibly another out-of-band verification) does not need to be to the registrant but works perfectly well to the registrar. That of course is much better for those of us that need to maintain the registry->registrar->registrant model and not introduce a registry->registrant component. > > I think a Registry <-> Registrant component is unavoidable for this type of service. The Registrant likely wants assurances that the Domain won't be changed in any way without her consent. Luis The registry has no contractual relationship with the registrant The registrant has a contractual relationship with the registrar The registrar has a contractual relationship with the registry So - no. Regards Michele > > Best regards > > -lem > > _______________________________________________ > provreg mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/provreg -- Mr Michele Neylon Blacknight Solutions Hosting & Colocation http://www.blacknight.co/ http://blog.blacknight.com/ http://mneylon.tel/ Intl. +353 (0) 59 9183072 Locall: 1850 929 929 Direct Dial: +353 (0)59 9183090 Fax. +353 (0) 1 4811 763 Twitter: http://twitter.com/mneylon ------------------------------- Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside Business Park,Sleaty Road,Graiguecullen,Carlow,Ireland Company No.: 370845 _______________________________________________ provreg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/provreg