Re: Registry lock - two-factor or intervention

Michele Neylon - Blacknight <[email protected]> Wed, 18 Sep 2013 23:32:29 +0000
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.provreg
Message-ID <D1AC4482BED7C04DAC43491E9A9DBEC38CDFBD76@bkexchmbx02.blacknight.local>
On 18 Sep 2013, at 23:59, Luis Muñoz <[email protected]>
 wrote:

> 
> On Sep 18, 2013, at 5:56 PM, Jay Daley wrote:
> 
>> We came to the conclusion that a manual verification (or possibly another out-of-band verification) does not need to be to the registrant but works perfectly well to the registrar.  That of course is much better for those of us that need to maintain the registry->registrar->registrant model and not introduce a registry->registrant component.
> 
> I think a Registry <-> Registrant component is unavoidable for this type of service. The Registrant likely wants assurances that the Domain won't be changed in any way without her consent.


Luis

The registry has no contractual relationship with the registrant

The registrant has a contractual relationship with the registrar

The registrar has a contractual relationship with the registry

So - no.

Regards

Michele

> 
> Best regards
> 
> -lem
> 
> _______________________________________________
> provreg mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/provreg

--
Mr Michele Neylon
Blacknight Solutions
Hosting & Colocation
http://www.blacknight.co/
http://blog.blacknight.com/
http://mneylon.tel/
Intl. +353 (0) 59  9183072
Locall: 1850 929 929
Direct Dial: +353 (0)59 9183090
Fax. +353 (0) 1 4811 763
Twitter: http://twitter.com/mneylon
-------------------------------
Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside Business Park,Sleaty
Road,Graiguecullen,Carlow,Ireland  Company No.: 370845

_______________________________________________
provreg mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/provreg