Re: Registry lock - two-factor or intervention

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Op 19-09-13 10:35, Antoin Verschuren schreef:
> Op 19-09-13 01:32, Michele Neylon - Blacknight schreef:
> 
>> The registry has no contractual relationship with the registrant
> 
>> The registrant has a contractual relationship with the registrar
> 
>> The registrar has a contractual relationship with the registry
> 
> Michele,
> 
> This is not the general case, so your statement is biased. In .nl,
> there is a contractual relationship between registrant and 
> registry. The role of the registrar is to offload administrative
> burden of the registry, the registrar acts as an administrative
> agent for the registrant. But technically there is always the
> parent-child relationship between registry and registrar in the
> form of a DNS

Oops, this is a typo, I meant between registry and registrant.

> delegation, so legally (at least in our jurisdiction) it cannot be 
> denied that a registry is offering a service to a registrant.
> 
> _______________________________________________ provreg mailing
> list [email protected] 
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/provreg
> 

- -- 
Antoin Verschuren

Technical Policy Advisor SIDN
Meander 501, PO Box 5022, 6802 EA Arnhem, The Netherlands

P: +31 26 3525500  M: +31 6 23368970
Mailto: [email protected]
XMPP: [email protected]
HTTP://www.sidn.nl/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJSOrmiAAoJEDqHrM883AgnL/QIALAZVIeGaL1e/oyXGwaaNCc4
7W7UZpshQq2sl6EbS0AQBJ1e7nH28+rZleSgufcM9pHOhO6JRdXwd1mXlMlPm3jc
UhdyQWmLjiNdv8HbxS7rbHA0FJKYzuZoo7GNMuigapjkukvUVaw5LBehe2vvmXuJ
higyscmWhrEjSyETAwXz+YQywBEa1apQ8n62YAcIOB+igkSZ0bmi3iRaO6pNJKYA
If6JG4mZ9GWSwXhyZjI2b0VRXgpwXANLcj/7gSj85DIpcUea4XeruhC7HU4OZ3oW
Qn6b04ihQEgcxcAzE0SgcMHX0+iytkdSRQ8nQX49MDWSXm4PwDRxINwxu8jTqH4=
=Cpy+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
provreg mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/provreg