Re: Registry Fee Extension for the Extensible Provisioning Protocol

Luis Muñoz <[email protected]> Thu, 31 Oct 2013 14:52:43 -0400
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.provreg
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Oct 31, 2013, at 1:31 PM, Gould, James wrote:

> 	• It would be good to support a more flexible set of commands, like we support the concept of sync (consolidate extension) that is also billable.  There might be other billable commands.

I agree to this. Creating launch applications, for example, could be something to add as well.

While responding in an ISO 4217 currency works well, there should also be support to respond in opaque or internal value representations. It is conceivable that an EPP server is currency agnostic, instead working with internal currency units.

Best regards

-lem


_______________________________________________
provreg mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/provreg