Re: Registry Fee Extension for the Extensible Provisioning Protocol

On Nov 1, 2013, at 6:17 AM, Gavin Brown wrote:

> Wouldn't the fee for the launch application simply be the <create> fee?
> I suppose an optional "phase" attribute could be added to the
> <fee:action> element, e.g.:
> 
> <fee:action phase="sunrise">create</fee:action>
> <fee:action phase="landrush">create</fee:action>

Yes, but the sub-phase should be added as well. Perhaps

<fee:action phase="custom" subphase="mumble">create</fee:action>

The subphase attribute could be made optional as perhaps the most common use cases won't require it.

>> While responding in an ISO 4217 currency works well, there should also be support to respond in opaque or internal value representations. It is conceivable that an EPP server is currency agnostic, instead working with internal currency units.
> 
> ISO 4217 includes the special purpose "XXX" code for non-currency
> transactions. I think this would suffice for this purpose, but the draft
> could be updated to specifically refer to it.

Ah, excellent. Yes, I think this is a good mechanism to convey this information.

Best regards

-lem

_______________________________________________
provreg mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/provreg