Re: Registry Fee Extension for the Extensible Provisioning Protocol

Gavin Brown <[email protected]> Fri, 01 Nov 2013 16:31:08 +0000
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.provreg
Organization CentralNic Ltd
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 01/11/2013 16:08, Luis Muñoz wrote:
> 
> On Nov 1, 2013, at 6:17 AM, Gavin Brown wrote:
> 
>> Wouldn't the fee for the launch application simply be the <create> fee?
>> I suppose an optional "phase" attribute could be added to the
>> <fee:action> element, e.g.:
>>
>> <fee:action phase="sunrise">create</fee:action>
>> <fee:action phase="landrush">create</fee:action>
> 
> Yes, but the sub-phase should be added as well. Perhaps
> 
> <fee:action phase="custom" subphase="mumble">create</fee:action>
> 
> The subphase attribute could be made optional as perhaps the most common use cases won't require it.

I'll add this to the next version.

G.

-- 
Gavin Brown
Chief Technology Officer
CentralNic Group plc (LSE:CNIC)
Innovative, Reliable and Flexible Registry Services
for ccTLD, gTLD and private domain name registries
https://www.centralnic.com/

CentralNic Group plc is a company registered in England and Wales with
company number 8576358. Registered Offices: 35-39 Moorgate, London,
EC2R 6AR.
_______________________________________________
provreg mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/provreg