Re: Registry Fee Extension for the Extensible Provisioning Protocol

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

We have also a lot of implementations where you do a check before you do
any other command so check should be as light and cheap as possible.

So ++ here also.

Best regards
jan

On 11/04/2013 04:15 PM, Luis Muñoz wrote:
> 
> On Nov 4, 2013, at 9:38 AM, MICHAEL W YOUNG wrote:
> 
>> I like the principle of extending <info>, it's in keeping with the concept of retrieving clarifying information, whereas <check> was meant to be cheap, fast, light-weight.
>>
>> There are significant cases of implementations where the underlying assumption is that <check> is a cheap query.  Some of which I was directly involved with :-)
> 
> ++
> 
> -lem
> 
> _______________________________________________
> provreg mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/provreg
> 

- -- 
+-------------------------------------------------------------------
! Irial / YASK AB
! Att: Jan Saell
! Box 59, S-692 21 KUMLA, SWEDEN
! Tel: 019-58 25 15     Int +46-19 58 25 15     Fax +46-19 58 38 05
! E-mail: [email protected]
! PGP Fingerprint: E957 23C8 9F51 0958 B9AD  7F18 404A 5DA1 F944 A08B

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iEYEARECAAYFAlJ331kACgkQQEpdoflEoIu/rQCeKQAcxS88O3YixdgXmE5062Q2
agEAoLkMuvpxhwjyRhnANyHv0Etl4k9W
=S8JW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
provreg mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/provreg