Re: Registry Fee Extension for the Extensible Provisioning Protocol

Hi Jan,

As of version 0.3 (the 00 version I submitted to the IETF) the extension
extends the <info> command rather than the <check> command.

G.

On 04/11/2013 17:54, Jan Saell wrote:
> We have also a lot of implementations where you do a check before you do
> any other command so check should be as light and cheap as possible.
> 
> So ++ here also.
> 
> Best regards
> jan
> 
> On 11/04/2013 04:15 PM, Luis Muñoz wrote:
> 
>> On Nov 4, 2013, at 9:38 AM, MICHAEL W YOUNG wrote:
> 
>>> I like the principle of extending <info>, it's in keeping with the concept of retrieving clarifying information, whereas <check> was meant to be cheap, fast, light-weight.
>>>
>>> There are significant cases of implementations where the underlying assumption is that <check> is a cheap query.  Some of which I was directly involved with :-)
> 
>> ++
> 
>> -lem
> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> provreg mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/provreg
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> provreg mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/provreg
> 

-- 
Gavin Brown
Chief Technology Officer
CentralNic Group plc (LSE:CNIC)
Innovative, Reliable and Flexible Registry Services
for ccTLD, gTLD and private domain name registries
https://www.centralnic.com/

CentralNic Group plc is a company registered in England and Wales with
company
number 8576358. Registered Offices: 35-39 Moorgate, London, EC2R 6AR.
_______________________________________________
provreg mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/provreg