RE: authors 48 hours: RFC 3318 <draft-ietf-rap-frameworkpib-09.tx t> NOW AVAILABLE
"Hahn, Scott" <[email protected]> Fri, 28 Feb 2003 16:38:48 -0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.rap |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Bert, I would agree with you and go with what we have today. -Scott -----Original Message----- From: Wijnen, Bert (Bert) [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 9:04 AM To: Hahn, Scott; Kwok Ho Chan; Sahita, Ravi; [email protected]; [email protected]; John Seligson; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Cc: Rap-wg (E-mail); Randy Bush Subject: RE: authors 48 hours: RFC 3318 <draft-ietf-rap-frameworkpib-09.tx t> NOW AVAILABLE W.r.t. The VLAN ID. I had proposed (to the bridgmib WG and mibs mailing list) a set of TCs that would be inline with your use, as follows: VlanId ::= TEXTUAL-CONVENTION DISPLAY-HINT "d" STATUS current DESCRIPTION "A 12-bit VLAN ID used in the VLAN Tag header." SYNTAX Integer32 (1..4094) REFERENCE "Draft Standard for Virtual Bridged Local Area Networks, P802.1Q/D10, chapter 3.13 " VlanIdOrAny ::= TEXTUAL CONVENTION DISPLAY-HINT "d" STATUS current DESCRIPTION "The VLAN ID that uniquely identifies a VLAN. The value of -1 is used to indicate a wildcard, i.e. any value. " SYNTAX Integer32 (-1 | 1..4094) The latter one, would have been inline with your use in frwk802FilterVlanId OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX Integer32 (-1 | 1..4094) STATUS current DESCRIPTION "The VLAN ID (VID) that uniquely identifies a VLAN within the device. This VLAN may be known or unknown (i.e., traffic associated with this VID has not yet been seen by the device) at the time this entry is instantiated. Setting the frwk802FilterVlanId object to -1 indicates that VLAN data should not be considered during traffic classification." ::= { frwk802FilterEntry 5 } But afte someone objected to a negative value for 'any, and based on Andrew's input I believe, people are now discussing VlanIdOrAny ::= TEXTUAL CONVENTION DISPLAY-HINT "d" STATUS current DESCRIPTION "The VLAN ID that uniquely identifies a VLAN. The value of 4095 is not a vlaid VLAN ID and is used to indicate a wildcard, i.e. any value. " SYNTAX INTEGER (1..4095) That would be conflicting with your definition, and I might later ask you to deprecate your object and define a new one that aligns with the generic VLAN ID as defined by the bridgemib WG. Unfortunately, they are not sure yet, Bridgemib WG chair is taking it to IEEE and they will discuss it in week of March 9th, So it will take a while before we know for sure. So I am inclined to let you go with what you have, or to redefine it as SYNTAX INTEGER (1..4095). In the latter case, pls again do a quick pseudo WG Last Call for the change. Please let me know how you want to proceeed. Bert