| Newsgroups |
gmane.ietf.rddp |
| Message-ID |
<[email protected]> |
Here's what the WG chair believes the current status of
drafts in the RDDP WG to be (if anything seems wrong here,
please let me know):
IETF RDDP WG Draft Status - March 2004, Seoul IETF meetings
-----------------------------------------------------------
-- Problem Statement and Architecture
draft-ietf-rddp-problem-statement-03.txt
draft-ietf-rddp-arch-04.txt
To become Informational RFCs.
Finished WG Last Call, and have been revised to respond to comments
from our Area Director. Further IESG discussion has generated
additional comments that will require further revisions.
-- Main Protocols
DDP (draft-ietf-rddp-ddp-02.txt)
RDMAP (draft-ietf-rddp-rdmap-01.txt)
To become Proposed Standard RFCs.
No technical issues meriting substantial meeting time. Waiting
on security draft (which will probably generate revisions to
the security considerations sections in these drafts)
before going to WG Last Call
-- Applicability Statement
draft-ietf-rddp-applicability-01.txt
To become an Informational RFC.
Believed to be in good shape - please review.
-- SCTP Mapping
draft-ietf-rddp-sctp-00.txt
To become a Proposed Standard RFC.
Despite the -00 version number, this is the fourth version of this draft,
and
it is relatively mature.
-- TCP Mapping
draft-ietf-rddp-mpa-00.txt
To become an Informational RFC.
The major open issues in this draft involve connection initiation/
startup. Substantial meeting time allocated to make progress.
draft-cully-mpa-issuesresponses-00.txt
Will not become an RFC. This draft describes issues raised about
MPA and the views of the MPA authors on those issues.
-- Security
draft-ietf-rddp-security-01.txt
Whether this will be Informational vs. Proposed Standard is TBD.
This draft is on the critical path to completing the DDP and RDMAP
drafts. Substantial meeting time has been allocated to it.