Re: RDDP status of drafts

I believe there are some in-progress edits on the RDMAP
authors' plate, but the document wasn't resubmitted before
the meeting. Renato, can you confirm?

Tom.

At 03:12 AM 3/2/2004, [email protected] wrote:
>Here's what the WG chair believes the current status of
>drafts in the RDDP WG to be (if anything seems wrong here,
>please let me know):
>
>IETF RDDP WG Draft Status - March 2004, Seoul IETF meetings
>-----------------------------------------------------------
>
>-- Problem Statement and Architecture
>
>draft-ietf-rddp-problem-statement-03.txt
>draft-ietf-rddp-arch-04.txt
>
>To become Informational RFCs.
>
>Finished WG Last Call, and have been revised to respond to comments
>from our Area Director.  Further IESG discussion has generated
>additional comments that will require further revisions.
>
>-- Main Protocols
>
>DDP (draft-ietf-rddp-ddp-02.txt)
>RDMAP (draft-ietf-rddp-rdmap-01.txt)
>
>To become Proposed Standard RFCs.
>
>No technical issues meriting substantial meeting time.  Waiting
>on security draft (which will probably generate revisions to
>the security considerations sections in these drafts)
>before going to WG Last Call
>
>-- Applicability Statement
>
>draft-ietf-rddp-applicability-01.txt
>
>To become an Informational RFC.
>
>Believed to be in good shape - please review.
>
>-- SCTP Mapping
>
>draft-ietf-rddp-sctp-00.txt
>
>To become a Proposed Standard RFC.
>
>Despite the -00 version number, this is the fourth version of this draft,
>and
>it is relatively mature.
>
>-- TCP Mapping
>
>draft-ietf-rddp-mpa-00.txt
>
>To become an Informational RFC.
>
>The major open issues in this draft involve connection initiation/
>startup.  Substantial meeting time allocated to make progress.
>
>draft-cully-mpa-issuesresponses-00.txt
>
>Will not become an RFC.  This draft describes issues raised about
>MPA and the views of the MPA authors on those issues.
>
>-- Security
>
>draft-ietf-rddp-security-01.txt
>
>Whether this will be Informational vs. Proposed Standard is TBD.
>This draft is on the critical path to completing the DDP and RDMAP
>drafts.  Substantial meeting time has been allocated to it.
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>rddp mailing list
>[email protected]
>https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rddp