Re: RDDP status of drafts

On Mar 2, 2004, at 2:12 AM, [email protected] wrote:

> -- SCTP Mapping
>
> draft-ietf-rddp-sctp-00.txt
>
> To become a Proposed Standard RFC.
>
> Despite the -00 version number, this is the fourth version of this 
> draft,
> and it is relatively mature.

Earlier I raised the question as to whether the TCP and
SCTP adaptations should be brought into alignment on
support for Active-Active session initiation.

I believe the consensus from reflector discussion was that
it was not worthwhile to add this functionality to MPA/TCP.

I suggest a quick poll at the WG meeting and/or reflector as
to whether the Active-Active support should be removed from
the SCTP mapping. As that legal sessions are defined by an
enumeration of legal patterns, removing one is a very simple
edit should that be the consensus.

I personally remain ambivalent on the issue, seeing both the
merits of flexibility and of eliminating test cases.