RE: Minn. meeting & draft status
Renato Recio <[email protected]> Tue, 1 Mar 2005 15:14:00 -0600
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.rddp |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <OF83E0FAB7.5A0E6BDF-ON86256FB7.0074729A-86256FB7.0074A39C@us.ibm.com> |
I agree with Mike, if there aren't any technical issues, I'd rather just
not have a meeting to chat on the weather :{) or other non-critical topics.
Also... though I already had tickets... my company would likely
appreciate me saving them hotel and meal expsenses.
Thanks
Renato J Recio
Chief Architect, eServer I/O
IBM Distinguished Engineer
Member IBM Academy of Technology
Tel 512-838-3685, T/L 678-3685
Michael Krause
<[email protected] To: "RDDP" <[email protected]>
m> cc:
Sent by: Subject: RE: [rddp] Minn. meeting & draft status
rddp-bounces@ietf
.org
03/01/2005 02:59
PM
I think status can be easily accomplished via the reflector and there is
little value-add in having a in-person meeting for such discussions. If
there are technical issues of merit to discuss, then this warrants such a
meeting but that is not what is being presented here.
Mike
At 12:54 PM 3/1/2005, Shah, Hemal wrote:
I agree with Tom that we need to meet to discuss status of various WG
action items rather than completely canceling the WG meeting. In
addition, at this time changing the flights at the last moment will
not
be possible for many of us who were planning to attend RDDP WG.
Hemal
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [ mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf
Of
Talpey, Thomas
Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2005 1:25 PM
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [rddp] Minn. meeting & draft status
At 12:08 PM 3/1/2005, [email protected] wrote:
>Since the WG Last call on the DDP, RDMAP and Security
>drafts has completed without any technical issues, I
>intend to cancel the RDDP WG meeting in Minneapolis,
>unless there are other technical issues to discuss
I think it would be a shame for folks who were in attendance
anyway not to meet. There was only one hour on the agenda,
and it seems that even a 10 minute review of the various WG
action items and their status would be a good thing to place
into minutes, for the record. Will IPS have any feedback for
us to discuss?
Tom.
_______________________________________________
rddp mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rddp
_______________________________________________
rddp mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rddp
_______________________________________________
rddp mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rddp
_______________________________________________
rddp mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rddp
graycol.gif
(image/gif, 105 B) - not displayed
ecblank.gif
(image/gif, 45 B) - not displayed
pic32590.gif
(image/gif, 1.2 KB) - not displayed