RE: WG Last Call *Concluded*l: Security, DDP, RDMAP

I'll resubmit the draft with the text removed immediately after the
black-out period.


Jim




> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf
Of
> [email protected]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2005 9:00 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [rddp] WG Last Call *Concluded*l: Security, DDP, RDMAP
> 
> The WG Last Call period on these documents has concluded.
> I have seen no technical issues raised on the mailing
> list, and hence these drafts have passed WG Last Call.
> 
> I have sent a number of editorial comments to the
> authors.  The only one that approaches being technical is
> that the following sentence in Section 4.1 of the security
> draft needs to be removed:
> 
> 	"If a specific implementation does not wish to address
> 	security issues resolved by the Resource Manager, there
> 	may in fact be no resource manager at all."
> 
> This needs to be removed because the Privileged Resource
> Manager and some of its security functionality are mandatory-
> -to-implement, even if the PRM need not be realized as a
> separately identifiable implementation component.  There is
> text elsewhere in the security draft, as well as in both
> the DDP and RDMAP drafts saying that the Privileged Resource
> Manager is mandatory functionality.
> 
> Draft authors should plan to prepare revised drafts during
> March, including checking the revised versions against the
> ID (nits) checklist:  http://www.ietf.org/ID-Checklist.html
> 
> I'd like to have revised drafts ready to be sent to the ADs
> & the IESG by the end of March, please.
> 
> Thanks,
> --David
> 
> > This is the message you've all been waiting for ...
> >
> > It is my pleasure to (finally!) announce the RDDP Working
> > Group Last Call on the following three drafts:
> >
> > DDP/RDMAP Security
> > 	(draft-ietf-rddp-security-06.txt)
> > Direct Data Placement over Reliable Transports
> > 	(draft-ietf-rddp-ddp-04.txt)
> > An RDMA Protocol Specification
> > 	(draft-ietf-rddp-rdmap-03.txt)
> >
> > This WG Last Call will run until 11:59pm Eastern Time
> > (US) on Monday, February 28th.  That should give the
> > draft authors and WG chair the rest of that week to
> > organize any Last Call issues that need attention at
> > the Minneapolis IETF meeting the following week.  An
> > hour of meeting time has been requested in Minneapolis,
> > but may be released if there's nothing to discuss.
> >
> > Technical comments need to be posted to this mailing list.
> > Editorial comments may be sent directly to the primary
> > draft authors:
> >
> > - Security: Jim Pinkerton <jpink -at- windows.microsoft.com>
> > - DDP: Hemal Shah <hemal.shah -at- intel.com>
> > - RDMAP: Renato J. Recio <recio -at- us.ibm.com>
> >
> > Please copy me (as WG chair - David Black <black_david -at-
> > emc.com>) on any editorial comments, just in case something
> > initially thought to be editorial turns out to have technical
> > content.
> >
> > There are other drafts linked to the WG's web page:
> >
> > http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/rddp-charter.html
> >
> > that may be of interest or relevance in reviewing the three
> > drafts for this WG Last Call.
> >
> > Many thanks to all whose hard work has gotten us this far,
> > --David (RDDP WG chair)
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------
> > David L. Black, Senior Technologist
> > EMC Corporation, 176 South St., Hopkinton, MA  01748
> > +1 (508) 293-7953             FAX: +1 (508) 293-7786
> > [email protected]        Mobile: +1 (978) 394-7754
> > ----------------------------------------------------
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > rddp mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rddp
> >
> 
> _______________________________________________
> rddp mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rddp