Re: Experiment #2 with multiple Reference headers (was References with multipl
"Charles Lindsey" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.rfc822 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
In <20050117235827.GA27714@ender> Laird Breyer <[email protected]> writes: >On Jan 18 2005, Charles Lindsey wrote: >> I think we need the term "header line" when speaking of the individual >> lines of a header field that has been folded. >> >A "header line" as you propose is not a semantic unit, since folding >white space can break the information at all sorts of places, and as >the mail winds its way to its destination, folded lines can be >rearranged several times in semantically equivalent ways. Yes, but what term do you use when you want to say "This *mumble* is longer than 998 characters", or "No *mumble* is allowed to consist of whitespace only"? I will grant you that perhaps "header line" is not the right term, because it is frequently used as a synonym for "header field" (aka, in common parlance, "header"). -- Charles H. Lindsey ---------At Home, doing my own thing------------------------ Tel: +44 161 436 6131 Fax: +44 161 436 6133 Web: http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~chl Email: [email protected] Snail: 5 Clerewood Ave, CHEADLE, SK8 3JU, U.K. PGP: 2C15F1A9 Fingerprint: 73 6D C2 51 93 A0 01 E7 65 E8 64 7E 14 A4 AB A5