gmane.ietf.rfc822

12782 articles on record, showing the most recent 50.

Re: References: none
30 Apr 2019 22:14:23 -0400
"John Levine" <[email protected]> • #12856
References: none
Tue, 30 Apr 2019 14:51:18 -0700
Johnathan Galton <[email protected]> • #12855
Re: base64 encoding in rfc2045...
Mon, 18 Mar 2019 08:15:25 -0700 (PDT)
Ned Freed <[email protected]> • #12854
base64 encoding in rfc2045...
Sun, 17 Mar 2019 15:24:35 -0400
"Valdis Klētnieks" <[email protected]> • #12853
Re: message/partial - is it still a thing?
Fri, 22 Feb 2019 01:04:06 +0000
Richard Clayton <[email protected]> • #12852
Re: message/partial - is it still a thing?
Thu, 21 Feb 2019 17:36:05 -0500
[email protected] • #12851
Re: message/partial - is it still a thing?
Thu, 21 Feb 2019 14:15:56 -0800
Lyndon Nerenberg <[email protected]> • #12850
Re: message/partial - is it still a thing?
Thu, 21 Feb 2019 10:01:49 -0800
Russ Allbery <[email protected]> • #12849
Re: message/partial - is it still a thing?
Thu, 21 Feb 2019 09:10:43 -0800 (PST)
Ned Freed <[email protected]> • #12848
Re: message/partial - is it still a thing?
Thu, 21 Feb 2019 13:42:02 +0100
Alessandro Vesely <[email protected]> • #12847
Re: message/partial - is it still a thing?
Thu, 21 Feb 2019 09:21:27 +0000
Paul Smith <[email protected]> • #12846
message/partial - is it still a thing?
Wed, 20 Feb 2019 23:03:20 -0500
[email protected] • #12845
Re: Mail headers on crack....
Fri, 15 Feb 2019 12:10:33 +0000
Tony Finch <[email protected]> • #12844
Mail headers on crack....
Thu, 14 Feb 2019 23:45:19 -0500
[email protected] • #12843
Re: Most common mail header fields seen with nonsyntactic values
Tue, 24 Jul 2018 23:17:08 -0400
Peter Occil <[email protected]> • #12842
Re: folded URLs
24 Jul 2018 12:50:05 -0400
"John R Levine" <[email protected]> • #12841
Re: Question regarding RFC 2369
Tue, 24 Jul 2018 11:42:58 -0400
Peter Occil <[email protected]> • #12840
Re: (no subject)
Tue, 24 Jul 2018 07:22:52 -0700 (PDT)
Ned Freed <[email protected]> • #12839
Re: (no subject)
Tue, 24 Jul 2018 00:33:12 -0400
Peter Occil <[email protected]> • #12838
Re: (no subject)
24 Jul 2018 00:28:11 -0400
"John R Levine" <[email protected]> • #12837
Re: (no subject)
Tue, 24 Jul 2018 00:25:38 -0400
Peter Occil <[email protected]> • #12836
Re: (no subject)
24 Jul 2018 00:13:15 -0400
"John Levine" <[email protected]> • #12835
(no subject)
Tue, 24 Jul 2018 00:02:04 -0400
Peter Occil <[email protected]> • #12834
Most common mail header fields seen with nonsyntactic values
Mon, 23 Jul 2018 23:28:51 -0400
Peter Occil <[email protected]> • #12833
Re: Question regarding RFC 2369
21 Jul 2018 16:19:53 -0400
"John Levine" <[email protected]> • #12832
Re: Question regarding RFC 2369
Sat, 21 Jul 2018 15:32:13 +0100
Alexey Melnikov <[email protected]> • #12831
Proposal to invoke a 7601bis effort
Fri, 1 Dec 2017 20:39:55 +0000
"Kurt Andersen (b)" <[email protected]> • #12830
Re: The joys of being an MUA maintainer...
Wed, 26 Apr 2017 01:06:43 -0400
Keith Moore <[email protected]> • #12829
The joys of being an MUA maintainer...
Sat, 22 Apr 2017 02:11:04 -0400
[email protected] • #12828
Re: [abnf-discuss] Wherefore no HTAB in literal text strings in ABNF
Thu, 18 Aug 2016 19:52:01 -0700
Dave Crocker <[email protected]> • #12827
Re: [abnf-discuss] Wherefore no HTAB in literal text strings in ABNF
Thu, 18 Aug 2016 19:47:03 -0700
Sean Leonard <[email protected]> • #12826
Re: [abnf-discuss] Wherefore no HTAB in literal text strings in ABNF
Mon, 15 Aug 2016 10:02:20 +0100
Paul Overell <[email protected]> • #12825
Re: [abnf-discuss] Wherefore no HTAB in literal text strings in ABNF
Mon, 15 Aug 2016 07:52:22 +0200
Carsten Bormann <[email protected]> • #12824
Re: Wherefore no HTAB in literal text strings in ABNF
Sun, 14 Aug 2016 18:37:11 -0700
Dave Crocker <[email protected]> • #12823
Wherefore no HTAB in literal text strings in ABNF
Sun, 14 Aug 2016 18:34:56 -0700
Sean Leonard <[email protected]> • #12822
Re: Q: Space stuffing (RFC 3676)
Mon, 18 Jul 2016 19:59:03 +0200
Alessandro Vesely <[email protected]> • #12821
Re: Q: Space stuffing (RFC 3676)
Mon, 18 Jul 2016 14:39:43 +0100
Tony Finch <[email protected]> • #12820
Q: Space stuffing (RFC 3676)
Mon, 18 Jul 2016 10:53:31 +0200
Alessandro Vesely <[email protected]> • #12819
Re: "--" first in lines to indicate start of signature
Fri, 01 Jul 2016 23:23:33 +0200
Florian Weimer <[email protected]> • #12818
Re: "--" first in lines to indicate start of signature
Tue, 5 Jan 2016 17:17:26 -0800
Randall Gellens <[email protected]> • #12817
Re: DKIM differs from "--" first in lines to indicate start of signature
Tue, 5 Jan 2016 08:57:07 -0800
Jim Fenton <[email protected]> • #12816
DKIM differs from "--" first in lines to indicate start of signature
Tue, 5 Jan 2016 14:29:26 +0100
Alessandro Vesely <[email protected]> • #12815
Re: "--" first in lines to indicate start of signature
Tue, 05 Jan 2016 07:52:38 -0500
Hector Santos <[email protected]> • #12814
Re: "--" first in lines to indicate start of signature
Mon, 04 Jan 2016 15:33:54 -0800
Russ Allbery <[email protected]> • #12813
Re: "--" first in lines to indicate start of signature
Mon, 04 Jan 2016 18:13:42 -0500
Hector Santos <[email protected]> • #12812
Re: "--" first in lines to indicate start of signature
Mon, 04 Jan 2016 12:00:52 -0800
Russ Allbery <[email protected]> • #12811
Re: "--" first in lines to indicate start of signature
Mon, 4 Jan 2016 21:00:22 +0100
Jacob Palme <[email protected]> • #12810
Re: "--" first in lines to indicate start of signature
Mon, 04 Jan 2016 14:53:58 -0500
Hector Santos <[email protected]> • #12809
Re: "--" first in lines to indicate start of signature
Mon, 4 Jan 2016 20:31:57 +0100
Jacob Palme <[email protected]> • #12808
Re: "--" first in lines to indicate start of signature
Mon, 04 Jan 2016 14:23:21 -0500
Hector Santos <[email protected]> • #12807