Wherefore no HTAB in literal text strings in ABNF
Sean Leonard <[email protected]> Sun, 14 Aug 2016 18:34:56 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.rfc822 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hello Knowledgeable ABNF Folks: I have been working with RFC 5234 lately. What is the rationale (or what are the rationales) for including SP %d32 but excluding HTAB %d9 in char-val, aka the literal text string? I am sure that this decision was not an oversight. It may be appreciated that the comment production is defined as WSP, which includes HTAB. Regards, Sean _______________________________________________ ietf-822 mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-822