Re: Wherefore no HTAB in literal text strings in ABNF
Dave Crocker <[email protected]> Sun, 14 Aug 2016 18:37:11 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.rfc822 |
|---|---|
| Organization | Brandenburg InternetWorking |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 8/14/2016 6:34 PM, Sean Leonard wrote: > I have been working with RFC 5234 lately. What is the rationale (or what are the rationales) for including SP %d32 but excluding HTAB %d9 in char-val, aka the literal text string? I am sure that this decision was not an oversight. I don't recall. Sorry. I could generate guesses, but that's all they'd be. d/ -- Dave Crocker Brandenburg InternetWorking bbiw.net _______________________________________________ ietf-822 mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-822