Re: draft-lilly-from-optional-01.txt
Bruce Lilly <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.rfc822 |
|---|---|
| Organization | Bruce Lilly |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thu February 24 2005 17:23, [email protected] wrote: > Unfortunately this is just not the way things are headed. Users are > increasingly not able to control these sorts of actions being done on their > behalf. For example, Sun filters all incoming mail and summarily discards > everything it thinks is spam. (In fact a recent misconfiguration led to a bunch > of mail being discarded incorrectly.) I have absolutely no control over this - > no way to change filter threshholds, no personal whitelist, no Bayesian > training, no option to file spam in a spam folder, nothing. And while it is > perhaps true that I wouldn't want and have no business receiving anonymous mail > sent to my Sun account, I deal with large ISP setups all the time and I can > tell you that many if not most of them are similarly set up and are similarly > inflexible. I understand, and have a similar situation. What I had in mind for recipients who might reasonably expect anonymous mail would be agencies getting reports from "whistleblowers", e.g. US OSHA. > Of course it is hard to tell when the ubiquity of such setups reaches a point > where it truly compromises the general ability to send anonymous email. Or indeed any email. > But my > guess is that if we haven't passed that point yet we're about to. Some observations: o mail used to be reasonably reliable; now an over-aggressive spam filter is likely to cause non-spam to disappear o other spam-related "solutions", are so obnoxious that they discourage correspondence via email o spam filters frequently mangle messages, especially MIME messages, to the point that content is unusable So, sure, some anonymous email will probably fall into a black hole. That happens to some non-anonymous email. My conclusion is that overzealousness in the fight against spam is as much a detriment to utility of email communication as spam itself is. And I suspect things will get worse before they get better. In the meantime, though, we shouldn't avoid solving existing problems where solutions are possible.