Re: MTS transparency and anonymity

> 
> Keith Moore wrote:
> 
> > I'd much rather define some convention for a non-replyable
> > address (e.g. From: <anonymous@[]> ) which is at least
> > syntactically compatible with RFC [2]822,
> 
> Nice idea, please don't forget to update BCP 32.  Bye, Frank

since this doesn't define a new domain name (it uses a domain
literal), there's no need to update BCP 32.

Keith