Re: MTS transparency and anonymity
Keith Moore <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.rfc822 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> > > I agree that it is wrong to reject null return paths altogether. However > > > your suggestion is incompatible with backscatter detection systems (such > > > as BATV or Signed Envelope Sender) which assume that null return paths are > > > only used for bounce messages. > > > > those systems are operating on false assumptions. it's never been the case > > that <> was limited to bounce messages. > > Yes. It'll be interesting to discover the extent of the interop problems :-) > > I think we're going to have to tighten up the rules about null return > paths and bounces, because of the backscatter problem. could you explain the backscatter problem? I'm not sure what you're referring to. Keith