Re: MTS transparency and anonymity

Keith Moore <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.rfc822
Message-ID <[email protected]>
> > > I agree that it is wrong to reject null return paths altogether. However
> > > your suggestion is incompatible with backscatter detection systems (such
> > > as BATV or Signed Envelope Sender) which assume that null return paths are
> > > only used for bounce messages.
> >
> > those systems are operating on false assumptions.  it's never been the case
> > that <> was limited to bounce messages.
> 
> Yes. It'll be interesting to discover the extent of the interop problems :-)
> 
> I think we're going to have to tighten up the rules about null return
> paths and bounces, because of the backscatter problem. 

could you explain the backscatter problem?  I'm not sure what you're referring
to.

Keith
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.