Re: MTS transparency and anonymity
"Charles Lindsey" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.rfc822 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
In <[email protected]> Bruce Lilly <[email protected]> writes: >On Mon February 28 2005 08:07, Charles Lindsey wrote: >> So we can consider how those requirements are met in the 4 cases: >> >> >> 1. No From 2. blah.invalid 3. @[] 4. From <> >> >> A. delivery 98% [1] 100% 98% 98% >[...] >> Clearly, this analysis shows that no solution is going to be perfect (but >> we knew that already). OTOH, it does seem to shown that #1 has worse >> problems than the others. >What it shows is that you can start from preconceived notions, >make up a bunch of random numbers unrelated to any sort of >testing or scientific basis, then say "See, it shows I was right". >Bollocks. There speaks a man whose mind is made up, and who does not wish to be confused by the facts. -- Charles H. Lindsey ---------At Home, doing my own thing------------------------ Tel: +44 161 436 6131 Fax: +44 161 436 6133 Web: http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~chl Email: [email protected] Snail: 5 Clerewood Ave, CHEADLE, SK8 3JU, U.K. PGP: 2C15F1A9 Fingerprint: 73 6D C2 51 93 A0 01 E7 65 E8 64 7E 14 A4 AB A5